Ann Coulter: The Republican Debbie Wasserman Schultz?

Ann Coulter:  On one of her more outspoken days

Todd Akin, Missouri, abortion and rape – patriotupdate.com/

Excerpt of Ann Coulter’s [Debbie Wasserman Schultz type] illogical and radical thinking:

>>>>>>>>>> ……. Ann Coulter summarizes:

“Republicans are not asking Akin to step aside because they suddenly found someone better. They are asking him to step aside because, by his own volition, he said something monumentally stupid, destroying his own candidacy.”…….. <<<<<<<<<<< – patriotupdate.com/

Moralmatters.org Comments to the above (aforementioned) news commentary:

Is Ann Coulter to the Republicans as Debbie Wasserman Schultz is to the lib Democrats? Is Ann Coulter the Republican equivalent of the Democrat, Debbie Wasserman Schultz?

Think about it for a moment and, I’m not referring to a comparison of political party office ranking. I’m alluding to extremist acting lib, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who is comfortable with a rabid news Network like MSNBC.  That media outlet lends itself to her radical political multicultural mindset. Now, Ann Coulter, on the other hand, loves to represent the Conservative purist ideology. Hence, her schizophrenic support of dumping Conservative Missouri Rep. Todd Akin, reflects that purist holier-than-thou attitude. But what is more troubling is that Coulter and the sanctimonious Karl Roves of the GOP, bow to the extremist cat calls of  libs who cry for Rep Akin to leave the Republican candidate status he won in the primary.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz minus Nancy Pelosi’s duplicate broom

Ask yourself:  Who’s the extremist? Debbie Wasserman Schultz who is (only) being true to her political correctness liberal roots; or, Ann Coulter, who with many Republicans and “Conservative” talk show hosts have fallen over one another to be first in line to politically call for Akin to abandon his Conservative Senatorial race.

Who are the extremists? Who are the radicals? Who are acting in schizophrenic political fashion? Who are the ones being secretly snickered about by the opposition political party?

One thing is sure.  The Republicans had better grow some genuine back bone.  Even if they should be victorious this 2012 presidential election; will they be the political lightweight wimps the media and libs are hoping they will continue to be? Will they keep dancing to the tune of the liberal media and freeze every time liberals call them out, accusing them of politically incorrect behavior?

Finally, who and what is more extreme?  Libs tolerating foul hate mongering and racist MSNBC media personalities (as is expected)? Or, to be politically slain by a (hypocritical) political party in et tu Brute betrayal fashion? And, other questions that are most appropriate to ask:

“Should Republican voters hop skip and jump to sanctimonious Republican ‘election (expert) artists’ who unrealistically expect too much of their fellow Republican Conservatives? Should Republican voters stand idly by when their political leaders and strategists cave to the compromising and political correctness standards of Republican holier-than-thou Ann Coulters and Karl Roves? Does the Republican Party need to be a political party of pacifists, placating the political left?

Related:

Ruthless Republicans shoot their wounded – moralmatters.org/2012/08/26/

MSNBC: Network of bigotry hate mongering and racism – moralmatters.org/2012/08/30/

_______________________________________

 

Please note for future voting consideration reference:

Election Projection – The Battle for Capitol Hill – 2012 Senate – electionprojection.com/2012elections/

The Complete List of Email Addresses and Fax Numbers for the U.S. Congress and Governors – conservativeusa.org/

U.S. Constitution Online – usconstitution.net/

 

Posted by:

Nathan M. Bickel

http://www.thechristianmessage.org/

http://moralmatters.org/

Note:  Above Photos [attributed to] found on the web

11 comments

  1. There is a major difference. Coulter speaks honestly, without lies. Her opinion is not couched in an altered reality, as is nearly everything DWS spews. I will take honest hyperbole any day. Hyperbolic lies though, belong to the devil and he belongs locked in hell.

    1. docmccarthy –

      Thank you for visiting http://www.moralmatters.org

      Also, thank you for your comment. I realize the difference of the two which you are pointing out. And, I will not disagree with that difference. But, be that as it may, I’m now thinking that I did not make clear enough in my commentary posting that I was zeroing in the the extremism of Wasserman and Coulter; – unless, you overlooked that. That, was the commonality which I thought (and still think) lends to their commonality. That is why I felt I could post the title which I did, comparing Coulter with Wasserman.

      Furthermore,
      my piece was intended to convey that Wasserman is expected to be extreme in her support of such MSNBC personalities which spew hate mongering and racism. Sometimes Americans don’t take that much exception to all that because we know how liberal Dems act and what motivates them. Coulter, on the other hand, is supposed to be a Conservative; at least that’s how she likes to comport herself. So, when she along with the holier-than-thou Republicans in Judas fashion, betray one of their own; that, is exceptionally extremist. Or, it should be viewed as such! And, even though Coulter has some strengths to bring to Republicans and Conservatism; she, at the same time needs to be taken to the critical woodshed! She is not beyond reproach!

  2. Yes, I agree that there can be that comparison made though I feel it was not always so. Ann Coulter has disappointed many as she engages herself with political rethoric from the left and allows herself to be compromised. Many times she has sounded just like a extreme liberal and I no longer can find her a credible source for conservatism. In the case in point, Todd Akin, she is just dead wrong. Even her “reasoning” is wrong and ridiculous. Christians don’t need to listen to her.

    1. BREE –

      Great comment! I agree! Although Coulter makes some good points now and then; she loses her credibility as you state. And, if Akin ends up losing; it will be because of the Ann Coulters of the Republican Party who have ants in their pants and cannot stand by fellow Republicans!

      Thanks again for visiting http://www.moralmatters.org and commenting!

    1. S. Ostrowski –

      Thank you for participating in the discussion here and for visiting http://www.moralmatters.org

      As to your comment: “…..And since when do Republicans dance to liberals’ tune?”

      I think that Republicans bend all the time to the lib media [tune] and those libs across the political aisle. This whole Akin controversy is just one example. Another huge example which has been played out, has been the whole assertion (by Democrats) that Obama’s character and background not be thoroughly examined; else whomever does, will be labelled conspiracy theorists, bigots, hate mongers, birthers and / or, racists………

  3. You’re right.
    I don’t detect ‘honesty’.
    If she was honest, she would come out and renounce that FAT boy, Chris Christie.
    We need REAL patriots like Nathan, Ann Barnhart and THE MAD JEWESS!!!

    1. TMJ – You have my both thumbs up to that comment of yours!

      Yes, Coulter’s obsession with Christie seems to be very strange. I can only speculate that she has some secret fantasy of Christie dominating her. Perhaps, Coulter is captivated by the lurid imaginative thrill of how long she could survive with her taking a type of submissive seat position with this GOP RINO……….

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s